zhgh_zjvtit/design-qa.md

福利项目分组配置设计验收

• Source visual truth: C:\Users\mayn\AppData\Local\Temp\codex-clipboard-73344a5b-ced8-4cca-952c-84eb3ad96fdd.png、C:\Users\mayn\AppData\Local\Temp\codex-clipboard-673ddf31-6705-49b0-8342-51f1f46c92da.png
• Implementation screenshots: F:\coding\zhgh_zjvtit_v4\target\codex-preview\welfare-group-initial.png、F:\coding\zhgh_zjvtit_v4\target\codex-preview\welfare-group-dialog-v2.png
• Comparison images: F:\coding\zhgh_zjvtit_v4\target\codex-preview\compare-initial.png、F:\coding\zhgh_zjvtit_v4\target\codex-preview\compare-dialog-v2.png
• Viewport: 1912 × 956 CSS px，device scale factor 1
• Source pixels: overall page 1737 × 906；dialog 1912 × 956
• Implementation pixels: overall component 1912 × 956；dialog 1912 × 956
• Density normalization: dialog uses equal pixel dimensions; overall page comparison focuses on the welfare-option region because the local harness intentionally excludes unrelated project form fields.
• State: group-required switch enabled; three welfare options, group values 1、1、empty; configuration dialog open with one deduplicated group.

Findings

• No remaining P0/P1/P2 visual mismatch in the requested welfare-option and group-configuration regions.
• Fonts and typography: implementation inherits the project Element UI and Microsoft YaHei/Helvetica font stack; headings, table labels, input text and button weights align with the reference hierarchy.
• Spacing and layout rhythm: toolbar is right-aligned, the group column sits beside the welfare name, and the dialog uses the reference-like 52% width and 560 px minimum height with the footer anchored at the bottom.
• Colors and visual tokens: implementation uses the existing project primary, border, muted text, overlay and danger tokens rather than introducing new colors.
• Image quality and assets: no new raster assets are required; upload and action icons use the existing Element UI icon font.
• Copy and content: 分组必选、配置分组选择数量、分组数据、最少选择数量、最多选择数量 and footer actions match the supplied reference.

Interaction Evidence

• Switch on: configuration button visible.
• Switch off: configuration button hidden.
• Switch on again: configuration button restored.
• Group extraction: duplicate group 1 is shown once and the empty group is filtered out.
• Defaults: minimum is 1, maximum is 0.
• Console: no browser errors were recorded.

Comparison History

1. Initial dialog capture found a P2 height mismatch: the dialog collapsed to its table content instead of matching the tall reference dialog.
2. Added a dedicated dialog class with a 560 px minimum height and flex body layout.
3. The second capture matches the reference dialog proportions and keeps the footer at the bottom; no actionable P0/P1/P2 issue remains.

Follow-up Polish

• None required for the requested scope.

2026-08-28 工具栏样式修正复核

• Source visual truth: C:\Users\mayn\AppData\Local\Temp\codex-clipboard-73344a5b-ced8-4cca-952c-84eb3ad96fdd.png
• Pre-fix implementation screenshot: C:\Users\mayn\AppData\Local\Temp\codex-clipboard-97abadfa-922a-4b9e-90e6-bd7d0d40e611.png
• Revised implementation screenshot: unavailable because the local Java web service is not currently listening on a browser-accessible port.
• Viewport/state: desktop project edit page, group-required switch enabled.
• Full-view evidence: the pre-fix screenshot shows the controls stacked at the table's left edge, while the source places them horizontally at the upper-right edge.
• Focused region evidence: source order is 分组必选 → 开关 → 配置分组选择数量; the pre-fix implementation wraps the button onto a second row.

Findings and fixes

• [Fixed in source, pending rendered confirmation] P1 toolbar placement: moved the controls into an explicitly loaded flex toolbar with right alignment.
• [Fixed in source, pending rendered confirmation] P2 button styling: added the reference-like 40 px height, light-blue background, blue border, icon/text color and hover state.
• [Fixed in source, pending rendered confirmation] P2 table rhythm: removed the 20 px gap so the toolbar connects directly to the table.
• Typography: retains the project's existing Element UI typography and 14 px action text.
• Colors: uses the project's Element UI primary-blue family.
• Images/assets: no raster assets are involved; the existing Element UI setting icon is retained.
• Copy/content: all requested Chinese labels remain unchanged.

Comparison history

1. User-provided pre-fix capture identified the invalid /deep/ component selectors and vertically wrapped controls.
2. Replaced those selectors and added the effective page-level stylesheet used by this server-rendered Vue page.
3. JavaScript syntax and Git whitespace checks passed; post-fix browser capture remains unavailable until the local application is started or refreshed.

2026-08-28 卡片背景与圆角按钮复核

• Source visual truth: C:\Users\mayn\AppData\Local\Temp\codex-clipboard-095c2fbf-eaaf-46a4-953b-9d1070638bdf.png
• Revised implementation screenshot: unavailable because the local Java web service is not listening on a browser-accessible port.
• Viewport/state: desktop welfare-project edit page with the welfare-options section visible.
• Full-view evidence: the reference groups the toolbar, table and add action within one white elevated card.
• Focused region evidence: the reference uses a subtle card radius/shadow and a compact blue add button with rounded corners.

Findings and fixes

• [Fixed in source, pending rendered confirmation] P2 card hierarchy: added a 1 px neutral border, 6 px radius and low-contrast shadow to the welfare-option card.
• [Fixed in source, pending rendered confirmation] P2 spacing rhythm: added 14 px horizontal/bottom card padding and a 10 px gap above the footer action.
• [Fixed in source, pending rendered confirmation] P2 button shape: added a dedicated 6 px radius to the add-welfare-option button while retaining Element UI primary states.
• Typography: unchanged and inherited from the existing Element UI design system.
• Colors: white card, #ebeef5 border and existing primary-blue button match the source hierarchy.
• Images/assets: this style correction does not require new raster assets.
• Copy/content: 添加福利选项 and all existing labels remain unchanged.

Comparison history

1. The supplied reference identified the missing soft card treatment and rounded add button.
2. Added semantic card/footer/button classes and matching page-loaded CSS.
3. JavaScript syntax and Git whitespace checks passed; post-fix browser capture remains unavailable until the local application is started or refreshed.

final result: blocked

2026-08-28 福利评价设计验收

• Source visual truth: C:\Users\mayn\AppData\Local\Temp\codex-clipboard-c7cafe9d-913d-4ba3-acb4-f1190c14cd78.png、C:\Users\mayn\AppData\Local\Temp\codex-clipboard-bbaf6b8d-5f27-40bd-b2d4-fdcb0d5b9f22.png、C:\Users\mayn\AppData\Local\Temp\codex-clipboard-1f0c70c6-cd0f-4369-a82e-12345e61447b.png
• Implementation screenshots: F:\coding\zhgh_zjvtit_v4\target\codex-preview\welfare-evaluation-desktop-v2.png、F:\coding\zhgh_zjvtit_v4\target\codex-preview\welfare-evaluation-mobile-v5.png
• Comparison images: F:\coding\zhgh_zjvtit_v4\target\codex-preview\compare-evaluation-desktop-v2.png、F:\coding\zhgh_zjvtit_v4\target\codex-preview\compare-evaluation-mobile-v5.png
• Viewports: desktop 1400 × 900 CSS px；mobile 420 × 938 CSS px；device scale factor 1.
• Density normalization: the 840 × 1875 mobile reference was normalized to 420 × 938 before side-by-side comparison.
• State: evaluation dialog/sheet open; three selected benefits; every score initially zero; remark empty.

Findings

• No remaining P0/P1/P2 visual mismatch in the requested evaluation dialog and bottom sheet.
• Desktop: title, information prompt, two-column benefit table, five-star control, zero-score prompt, 200-character remark and footer actions match the reference hierarchy.
• Mobile: the existing hero/card design is retained; the evaluation action, bottom rounded sheet, drag handle, close action, benefit rows and bottom actions align with the supplied mobile reference.
• Typography and colors inherit the project's Element UI/Vant design systems; no unrelated visual tokens or custom raster assets were introduced.
• Copy includes the selected quantity for every benefit and consistently uses 评价（5星制）、备注、取消 and 提交评价.

Interaction Evidence

• The third star in the first mobile row was clicked and exposed aria-checked=true, confirming one-star-per-point selection behavior.
• The default state renders all items with zero stars and an empty remark.
• The PC and mobile production scripts passed JavaScript syntax checks during implementation; the Java backend passed an offline Maven compile.
• The local visual harness recorded no blocking render error. Database-backed API submission still requires the supplied SQL to be executed in the target environment before end-to-end testing.

Comparison History

1. The first mobile pass produced an evaluation sheet that was visibly taller than the reference.
2. Reduced header margins, table row height and footer height, then restored the reference drag handle.
3. The final sheet begins at the same vertical position as the normalized reference and preserves all actions without page-level scrolling.
4. The PC zero-score state was corrected to explicitly display 请点击评分, matching the reference.

Follow-up Polish

• None required for the requested visual scope.

final result: passed

2026-08-28 移动端“去评价”按钮设计验收

• Source visual truth: C:\Users\mayn\AppData\Local\Temp\codex-clipboard-fd28cb5c-c88c-4c99-8789-4b5083bc812c.png
• Implementation screenshot: F:\coding\zhgh_zjvtit_v4\target\codex-preview\welfare-evaluate-button-final.png
• Full-view comparison: F:\coding\zhgh_zjvtit_v4\target\codex-preview\compare-welfare-evaluate-button-final.png
• Focused comparison: F:\coding\zhgh_zjvtit_v4\target\codex-preview\compare-welfare-evaluate-button-focus-final.png
• Viewport: 431 × 911 CSS px，device scale factor 1.
• Source pixels: 862 × 1822；implementation pixels: 431 × 911；source was normalized to 431 × 911 before comparison.
• State: “我的福利”卡片已显示，评价弹层关闭，评价入口处于默认可点击状态。

Findings

• No remaining P0/P1/P2 mismatch in the requested evaluation-button region.
• Fonts and typography: 去评价 uses the existing Vant/project font stack at 14 px and matches the reference's compact action hierarchy.
• Spacing and layout rhythm: the implementation uses a 34 px button height, 17 px pill radius, 13 px horizontal padding and 6 px icon gap; the resulting width matches the normalized reference closely.
• Colors and visual tokens: border, icon and copy reuse the existing #1989fa primary blue on a white background.
• Image quality and assets: the icon uses Vant's real star font icon; no SVG, CSS drawing, emoji or raster placeholder was introduced.
• Copy and content: the label is 去评价, matching the supplied reference.

Interaction Evidence

• Clicking 去评价 opened the welfare-evaluation bottom sheet.
• The button remained visible and accessible as a semantic button.
• Browser console errors: 0.
• JavaScript syntax and Git whitespace checks passed.

Comparison History

1. Initial implementation used comment-o、评价 and a 6 px rounded rectangle, which differed from the supplied target.
2. Replaced the icon with the closest matching existing Vant star icon, changed the copy to 去评价, and applied the pill treatment.
3. Focused comparison found the first 97 px implementation width slightly wider than the approximately 93 px normalized target; horizontal padding and icon size were reduced.
4. Final implementation matches the target size, border, color, copy and overall visual weight without an actionable P0/P1/P2 issue.

Follow-up Polish

• P3: the reference star contains a small inner highlight while the closest existing Vant star glyph is solid; retaining the project icon library avoids introducing a custom asset for this minor difference.

final result: passed